I recently heard of a case where an agent, who usually books a reasonably priced colleague of mine, instead booked one of his students for a corporate gig. The colleague was, understandably, puzzled. His student has only just got into magic and knew a total of two tricks.
In a "normal" situation where a client wants to impress his or her guests, they would seek out a particular act based on reputation or recommendation. But more often than not nowadays, clients are booking acts through agencies.
More often than not nowadays, those agencies have never actually seen any of the acts they represents.
More often than not nowadays, those agencies only have a life of about a year.
A client might come to them with a budget of $1000. A good agent, one that wishes to keep the client by providing the best possible act, will sell them someone priced from $750 to $900 and keep the balance as their commission.
The not-so-good agency will find the cheapest possible act, even one as cheap as $100, and keep the balance as commission.
Unfortunately, the good agencies are becoming fewer as more and more "price competitive" agents are popping up with acts that are much cheaper (ie: not considered a good enough standard by the good agencies).
The result. Less work for the good acts in the short term because the cheaper acts will be pushed instead (higher commissions!). Less work for the good acts in the long term because the clients won't want to hire a magician after they have the cheaper acts...
Why the sudden increase in the dodgy agents?
Perhaps it has to do with the fact that money is still tight as we ride out the tail end of the GFC?
Perhaps it has to do with the fact that one magician, he who shall not be named, has been raping and pillaging the industry without repercussion for the last few years?
His modus operandi has been to blanket-bomb with advertising and take as many gigs as possible, regardless of budget. He then picks and chooses the best of the bunch, and farms the rest off to other "colleagues" around Australia. Sure the clients are disappointed that they didn't get the magician they booked based on the advertising... but he did warn them if he couldn't make it he'd send a colleague... And the colleagues were happy, they were getting twice their usual fees (eg: $400 instead of $200) and he was happy because the clients were paying eg: $2000 and he was getting a $1600 commission!)
Other people have watched this magician doing this for years and some have been disgusted by his lack of ethics, while others have chosen to model their behaviour after him in hopes that they can be as successful.
But his success has come at a price. His habit of dropping a lower paying gig in preference to a higher paying one (using the excuse of a sore back) has resulted in so many agents refusing to book him that he's formed his own online agencies. Plus he's found yet another way to rort his magician colleagues by charging them a fee to be represented by him!
Magic is a business.
Back in the 1980s and early 1990s clients were much more "hands-on" and searched out good acts by name. Word of mouth was the key and your reputation was everything.
Now it's the CEO's PA who is given the task to arrange the event and source the entertainment. They Google 'Magician' and book the first name that comes up. (Our magician even offers PAs a bonus Myer Gift Card to them on the side as a thankyou for booking him). As most companies have annual events, and will book a magician one year, then a comedian, then a singer etc... they will only use a magician once every five years or so and by then the PA has been replaced and the new PA will probably inadvertently book the same bad magician...
Surprisingly, despite our increase in instant communication, people don't "talk" as much anymore.
Back in "the day" people would be chatting about how good (or bad) the magician was for weeks.
Now, the day after the big event, the PA who booked the bad act goes into damage control and emails a post-event report to everyone saying how fantastic the night was and how great the act was. Everyone sitting in their little cubicles assumes they must be the only one who didn't like the act and consensus is formed by a majority of one.
Is there a light at the end of the tunnel?
Is there a way for the good acts to get the gigs again?
Strangely enough many of the good acts are choosing to tour theatres with their own solo shows. Aside from the artistic satisfaction of having people come specifically to see you, the idea is to build a brand so that clients will ask, not for a magician, but for you by name.
Ironically, there is a lot more work and a lot less profit in staging a theatre show than there is in a corporate gig (assuming a fair commission is taken by a good agent).
So if good agents are few and fair between, what is the answer?
Kids parties.
That's right. It's the only area of magic where word-of-mouth is king. Parents will generally only book an act for their darling's celebration based on a trusted recommendation.
At $350 a pop, and some performers doing ten or more shows a week.... it's solid, regular income where the client is choosing you above all other acts based on the quality of your work.
Hopefully, one day, the corporate market will again take booking acts just as seriously.
Recent Comments